—BioElectricHealth.org—
Where the Knowledge Meets the Node!
This page is an extrapolation of the
Conjugation of DRIGS
(DRIGS) page. The
components of the DRIP
model encompass at least twice as many factors than the two dimensional
configuration of Power's playing field, as presented in the DREGS
model.
Take the DRIP.
To begin with, it's a cube. You could think that the
Earth is inside the DRIP
in a metaphoric sense. The actions that are played out here are governed by
how the DRIP
is managed. To the degree that the DRIP
functions competently, the level of of life here possess a desirable
quality. To the degree that the DRIP
is managed incorrectly, the quality of life here becomes less tolerable.
As the outer, contains the inner, so the
DROP contains the DRIP.
If you encased the DRIP
in another layer of cubes, completely surrounding it, with a cube at each of
the DRIP's
corners (8 in all), a cube covering each of the DRIP's
faces (6 in all), and a cube over each of the DRIP's
edges (12 in all), you will have a total of 26 cubes composing the
DROP,
surrounding the single cube of the DRIP.
If you've ever taken
apart a Rubik's Cube
extensively, you might have observed that from the outside it could be
viewed as if it were a cube composed of 26 outer cubes surrounding one
central cube. That is not exactly the way that it is, but it could be
imagined to be configured that way. That is the way that the DRIP
of the
DROP
model is configured.
You could think of the
DRIP
as
"The Power House," in the middle of the
DROP; where
the outer cubes of the
DROP
are the pure versions of the features of the
DRIP
that they come in contact with.
That brings us to entailing the
features that comprise the
DRIP.
-
The DRIP
is a cube.
-
A cube, having eight corners gives
to the DRIP
eight primary features.
-
Those eight features are composed
of dichotomies of four concepts.
-
The four concepts that compose the
four dichotomies of the
DRIP
are:
-
Technology
-
Humanity
-
Economics
-
Religion
-
Possible relevant dichotometric
relationships could be:
-
Hard vs. Soft
-
Difficult vs. Easy
-
Undesirable vs. Desirable
-
Obscurant vs. Illuminant
-
Uninformed vs. Informed
-
Right vs. wrong
-
Good vs. Bad
-
Poor vs. Rich
-
Superior vs. Subordinate
-
Affluence vs. Poverty
-
Strong vs. Weak
-
Civilized vs. Barbaric
-
Sick vs. Well
-
Sane vs. Insane
-
Honest vs. Corrupt
-
Happy vs. Sad
-
Love vs. Hate
-
Live vs. Dead
-
Heaven vs. Hell
-
Space vs. Time
-
Matter vs. Energy
-
Space/Time vs. Matter/Energy
-
Incorporeal vs. Corporeal (physical)
-
Honest vs. Criminal
-
Male vs. Female
-
Masculine vs. Feminine
-
DeMon vs. AnGel; where An=Right, De=Wrong, Gel=Good
& Mon=Bad
-
AnMon vs. DeGel
-
AnMon vs. GelDe
-
MonAn vs. DeGel
-
MonAn vs. GelDe
-
AnDe vs. GelMon
-
AnDe vs. MonGel
-
DeAn vs. MonGel
-
DeAn vs. GelMon
-
Cause vs. Effect
-
In the DRIP configuration, dichotometric relationships are oriented to one
another such that each pole of the a dichotomy is one corner (vertex) of
reciprocally oriented tetrahedrons. The vertices (corners) of the two
reciprocally related tetrahedrons are interlaced and coincidental
with the corners of the cube such that the axes of the dichotomies, so
formed, run through the center of the cube, which is also the center of
either of the two reciprocally related tetrahedrons.
-
The DRIP
configuration, is a
dichotomization of the
DREGS configuration. It
took the act of increasing the configuration of usable space from being
the area upon a surface to being the volume of a contained region of
space.
-
Home plate of the
DREGS
is the home axis of the DRIP,
which extends between the poles any of the above named dichotomies,
depending upon what relationships one trying to study.
-
Each of the remaining bases are
aligned in a like manner.
-
The base lines of the zigzag
around the cube along the edges of the tetrahedrons
-
The edges of the two tetrahedrons
form "Xs" on the faces of the cube, which form the borders of the cubic
region that is the DRIP.
-
Again, you can think of the DRIP
as containing Earth, metaphorically speaking.
The reason for such a model is to suggest the connectedness
between the factions of power, as they manifest in ones daily
life, so that one might be better prepared to correctly ascertain what is
occurring while one can yet do something about it.
|
The DRIP—Interaction of the
Axes—Phenomena Correlation Table*
|
1
|
Ball Diamond
Base Name
|
Home (Start)
|
First
|
Second
|
Third
|
Home (Finish)
|
2
|
Primary Spheres of
Human Activity
|
Religion
|
Technology
|
Humanities
|
Economics
|
Religion
|
3
|
Islamic Geo-Alignment of Wrestling Ring Posts
|
East
|
North
|
West
|
South
|
East
|
4
|
Christian Geo-Alignment of Wrestling Ring Posts
|
North
|
West
|
South
|
East
|
North
|
5
|
Scientologic concepts of activities
associated with each axes
|
Be (According to René Descartes,
"Think.")
|
Do (act)
|
Have (own)
|
Exchange (trade, buy/sell)
|
Be (According to René Descartes,
"Think.")
|
6
|
Commonly accepted labels for concepts
of activities performed by runners at each base
|
Plan—figure out what to do
|
Work—affect a
desirable change
|
Own—accept
responsibility for one's thoughts, actions, possessions and resultant
situation
|
Trade—exchange what
one has for what one needs to continue to exist, money merely being a
means for the accomplishment of this activity
|
Plan—figure out what to do
|
7
|
4 Stroke Internal Combustion Engine
Actions accomplished at each base/post
|
Intake
|
Compression
|
Power
|
Exhaust
|
Intake
|
8
|
Controling
Law
|
|
Evidentiary
|
Civil (Law of Voucher)
|
Arithmetic
|
|
9
|
Governing
Hierarchy
The suffix -ist has been inserted into each term to denote
the idea that the hierarchies are each composed of the believers of each
of those particular modes of the conveyance of power over and to the
general constituent—the individual
—who is a subordinate of relevant phenomena from all four of the hierarchies',
together and separately.
|
Theocracy
|
Technocracy
(The governing system that a technology based DREGS would evoke would
have to contain the socialist doctrine: "From Each according to
ability. To each according to need," or unwieldy imbalance would be
produced.
|
Sociocracy (Democracy)
|
Plutocracy
(Economocracy)
|
Theocracy
is basically run communistically in that the ruler/s own that which owns
material. Thus there is one body of material that is owned by the owning
entity/s, which is/are generally called, god/s, God/s, or as it,they
seem/s to be in the DRIP, "GOD".
|
10
|
Alignment of The Four Ministries of Oceana from George Orwell's book, 1984, as
delineated in one powerful, perfectly concise sentence on page 178, or
the second to last page of the ninth chapter, of that work, with the
Tetraheteromodocratic phenomena of, "The DREGS."
Interesting side note: Though I thought that I should
read 1984 for a long while and am very glad that I finally did, I didn't
actually get to until 2006—a year after
first composing, "The DREGS," paradigm
(model).
|
Ministry of Truth
The Truth should be what governs all, which is what, at least
theologically oriented people believe that the entity known as, "God,"
does (govern all).
|
Ministry of Plenty
How do you make more, or at least enough? That is the the province of
the Scientist plus the Engineer team—Technology.
|
Ministry of Love
All of the phenomena
involved with love has something to do with people and their
relationships with one another.
|
Ministry of Peace
For peace to exist, the individuals involved need to feel that they are
being dealt with fairly, which is the primary reason for the invention,
continued manufacture and use of money.
|
Ministry of Truth
The Truth should be what governs all, which is what, at least
theologically oriented people believe that the entity known as, "God,"
does (govern all).
|
11
|
A Biblical
Correlation:
Proverbs 30: 24-28, "Four Exceedingly... Wise Things"
|
Spider/Lizard
|
Coney (rabbit)
|
Locust
|
Ant
|
Spider/Lizard
|
12
|
Which
Scientologic
"Dynamic of Existence'"
Interaction Could be Seen as Generating Which Sphere's Activity,
Primarily
|
Between 7'th and 8'th
|
Between 5'th and 6'th
|
Between 2'nd
and 3'rd
|
Between 1'st and 4'th2
|
Between 7'th and 8'th
|
13
|
Subject
Headings
|
Religion and Religious
Philosophy
|
Sciences, Engineering
and Math
|
Humanities, Writing,
Literature, Language,
Art, Music and History
|
Economics and Business
|
Religion and Religious
Philosophy
|
14
|
Primary
Vital Products
|
Ideas
|
Appreciation
|
People
|
Assets
|
Ideas
|
15
|
Primary
Items of
Exchange
|
Loyalties and Incorporeal
Goods and Services
|
Physical/Material
Goods and Services
|
Emotional Goods and
Services
|
Monetary
Phenomena
|
Loyalties and Incorporeal
Goods and Services
|
16
|
"Y,"
Correlation
|
You
|
Yang
|
Yin
|
Yen
|
You
|
17
|
Scientific
Correlation
|
Thought
|
Radiation
|
Gravity
|
Electricity
|
Thought
|
18
|
Possible
Genetic Inclinations
|
Native American
|
Caucasian
|
Asian
|
African
|
Native American
|
19
|
Representative Object
of Each Particular
Sphere of Human Activity
|
World
|
Planet
|
Ball3
|
|
World
|
20
|
Possible
Causality
Loop's Designations5
|
Finger
|
Yo-Yo6
|
Domino
|
String
|
Finger
|
21
|
A Possible
Alignment of the Four Primary Features of Music
|
Lyrics
|
Melody
|
Harmony
|
Rhythm
|
Lyrics
|
22
|
A Possible Alignment of Card Suits
Plus a Little Reasoning Involved in this Selection of Categories
|
Spades: Power; The default trump suit.
|
Diamonds: Symmetric physical structure; Lowest
power; The Zen Feathers of the deck.
|
Hearts: Love, what players need to tolerate each
other enough to continue the game with each other.
|
Clubs: Associated with death, or the
transformation of states; trade offs.
|
Spades: Power; The default trump suit.
|
23
|
|
Ethos: Considerations of, "The Ideal."
|
Logos: Common sense, practical ideation regarding
functional phenomena.
|
Pathos: Anecdotal phenomena.
|
Justos: From, "Justice;" What I am calling the
"The Statistics" category of, "Modern Rhetorical Training;" Here
regarding the assessment of results that have been obtained via the
previous application of Rhetorical Training to the resolution of
even prior phenomena.
|
Ethos: Considerations of, "The Ideal."
|
24
|
The Four Administrative Ministries of
the Ottoman Empire7
|
The Palace
|
The Military
|
Culture and Religion
|
Finance
|
The Palace
|
25
|
A Possible Alignment of "The Elements"
as They Appear in Writings of Mythology
|
Air
|
Fire
|
Earth
|
Water
|
Air
|
26
|
Optimal
Configuration of the DRIP's Cyber-systems'
Formats (forms of government) 8
|
Communistic
(In this case, the religious organization involved poses as the
State, governing an egalitarian and in its eyes, possessionless mass
of adherents.)
|
Socialistic
(From each according to ability, to each according to need.)
|
Democratic
(One individual equals one vote.)
|
Capitalistic
(Money talks. The most money talks the loudest.)
|
Communistic
(In this case, the religious organization involved poses as the
State, governing an egalitarian and in its eyes, possessionless mass
of adherents.)
|
27
|
Hindu Caste
Coordination9
|
Brahmins (Priests)
|
Vaisya (Skilled Labor)
|
Sudra (Servants)
|
Kshatriya (Professionals)
|
Brahmins (Priests)
|
28
|
Evilly Ordered World's (EOW's,
pronounced: yeow) Infield's Players10
|
POUF (Perpetuation Of Unawareness Foundation)
|
COUT (Coalition of
Underhanded Trechery)
|
SPITE (Society for
the Perpetuation of the Incumbent Tetraheteromodocracy's
Evil)
|
PIMMMP (Profiteer's
Implementing Manipuable Manipulative Monetary Practices)
|
POUF (Perpetuation Of Unawareness Foundation)
|
29
|
Rightly Ordered World Situation (ROWS')
Infield's Players11
|
CARE (Continuing Awareness of the
Rightfully Emancipated)
|
WHAT (World's
Honestly Associated Technologists)
|
AHUH (Association
Helping to Understand, Honestly)
|
SURE (Society for the
Ubiquitization of Rightful Economics)
|
CARE (Continuing Awareness of the
Rightfully Emancipated)
|
*The primary point of this table is to present
interpretations of the observation that: there seems to be four (4) different main
axes of human endeavor and that: there is
some consecutive order of events that occurs among those axes that
serves to manifest the continually evolving situation that a person
finds their self in. This table is offered, not as
an ironclad answer to everything, but rather a means to possibly
ascertain what the more occluded, but still causal inter-axes activity
that may
be responsible for generating the evolving situation that one finds their self
involved with is, so that they might more readily evaluate their situation in order to
increase their odds of winning at what they are attempting to do.
-
Knowledge of the
Scientologic
"Dynamics of Existence"
is definitely a prerequisite for understanding this category (row).
Please notify me
if the link is cold, so that I can patch it up.
Thank you.
The relationship between the way L. Ron Hubbard presents the
relationship of "The Dynamics of Existence" and the way that I,
Philip B. Obsharsky, depict them here in "The DRIP," I explain
thus: A person, as they are dealing with the axes of the DRIP, each experience the particular phenomena that
comprise their personal Dynamics, as L. Ron Hubbard describes them,
where the totality of phenomena that comprise "The DRIP" is that
part of each person's particular "Dynamics of Existence" they
contribute to the existence of the DRIP. The DRIP is
the result of every entity's contribution to the DRIP's existence, whether
that contribution is a cognitive one, or not. The DRIP that
we play in today was the product of all of yesterday's
contributions. The DRIP that some entities will find them selves
playing in tomorrow will be the result of yesterday's, plus
today's contributions. DRIPsian observation—"Yesterday
plus today equals tomorrow." I may be wrong here, but it seems to me
like The Dynamics of Existence, as L. Ron Hubbard presents
them are today, now, living phenomena, where The DREGS
is the infrastructure that that phenomena plays out in, itself the
product of the interplay of people's Dynamics of Existence.
-
Though the numbers can be quite different, due to
relatively disparate geo-economic conditions, "Money," is the phenomenon
that has developed into the quantified representation of the whole
Globe,
which is owned by all of the living people, and is divided among
individuals according to its own and the other axes' laws, so that
individuals can have a means to stabilize the relationship between their
self and everybody else, which is what money, in a way, represents.
-
Adopted here
because of its use in the terms, "Don't drop the ball," meaning: a
part of a social activity that one is supposed to carry out and, "At
the ball," meaning: an elaborate dance, which is a social
activity.
-
Adopted here
because of the use of the term, "Global," as a term that represents:
internationally encompassing financial matters.
-
This is like,
"Paper/Scissors/Rock," which is a game involving the facts
that, A) Paper covers Rock, B) Scissors cut paper and C) Rock dulls
Scissors. However this one is with four entities, instead of
three. IMO, Finger/String/Yo-Yo/Domino is a
more robust analysis paradigm (model) than the mono-tiered, "Domino
Theory," of the 1970's, which stated that, "If Asian expansion
wasn't arrested on the mainland, it would proceed to spread down
through the Philippians to Australia, etc, until it engulfed the
world." Finger/String/Yo-Yo/Domino theory incorporates a
vertical component in the model. A Finger pulls a String that swings a
Yo-Yo
that knocks over a Domino that may or may not cascade into others,
whose actions could proceed to stress other Fingers,
Strings or Yo-Yos as
they tip onto their affiliated entities. I get the idea that String
means Money from the term,
"Purse Strings."
-
There's a natural rule
regarding the relationship between Fingers and Yo-Yos that can be
related to the relationships of other levels of activities also. It
proceeds thus: When a Yo-Yo swings a finger, that finger stops
actually being a finger (the proprietor of the governing idea,
information, whammy, law, principal, or whatever is, at that point,
actually controling the situation). The more accurately one can
determine the de facto dynamics, as opposed to alleged, or pseudo
factors, here meaning, "Public Relations," or, "Hype," involved with
the alignment of any activity that comprises the so analyzed
situation in the DRIP, and act accordingly, the better that that
person will make out regarding that situation.
-
[re: Grolier's Encyclopedia;
Ottoman Empire] The Ottoman's Ministries are aligned in the way that
they are, because:
-
The cultural aspect of religion
is what would have "Culture and Religion" align more with the
Humanities column than the Religion column.
-
Since Muslim national hierarchy
is oriented more Theocratically, the Palace Ministry has been placed
in the Religion column.
-
Since there is a Technologic
aspect to most military phenomena, the Military Ministry was placed
in the Technology column.
NOTE ADDED
2005's November's 07'th: An interesting phenomenon is
the difference between the catcher's—the theologian's—and the third
baseman's—the economist's—considerations of the physical size of what
the field that they are trying to deal with is called, in comparison to
their own stature, by what they call it and why that might be so. Let me
explain. Where the theologians view their sphere of activity as, "The
World," which is large by comparison to the individual; the economists
view their sphere of activity as "The Globe," which is relatively small
compared to the size of the individual. This difference emphasizes the
difference between the theosophist and the economist. Where the
theosophist seeks a power greater than their self (God) as the remedy of
their issues, the economist believes their selves to be the controling
agent of their remedy (money) of their issues. I say this, because from
observing this difference of terminology, I believe that the theosophist
might be attempting to garner the alliance of others to solve the issues
that cumulatively they consider to be The World, which is,
"Greater than their selves," theoretically requiring an agent that is
greater than it, even, with which to work in order to control and
resolve issues in it. This perspective garners adherents that
have obtained the understanding that they can be defeated and are
seeking a powerful ally to help them resolve their issues. Now, the
person playing third base—the economist—is either projecting the believe
that they can be in the manipulator of the smaller entity—the globe—via
their competent use of their assets, or because they are attempting to
maintain the consideration among people that money is needed in order to
maintain its value, they are projecting the idea that a
monetary worker's domain is smaller than their selves, thus controllable
and resolvable via their remedy, that being the monetary phenomena that
their adherents (capitalists) contribute to them to help those adherents
resolve their issues. This correlation points out both the similarities
and differences between the two orientations of the conveyance of power
through the general milieu (sentient life's environment). My particular point is that I think that the
controling agents concerned are more the same, merely clothing
themselves in different words in order to solve their problems via
different means, than they are actually different from one another. The more
major difference lies between the -ists—the believers—and the
-crats—the powers that control what is believed; Theist vs. Theocrat
/ Economist vs. Economocrat (Plutocrat) and more neologistically (having
to do with making up new words); capitalist (a person that believes in
the power associated with the competent control of money) versus
capitalistocrat (one that has control over people that believe in the
power associated with the competent control of money).
Recommended Resolution:
Exhaustively evaluate other's considerations for validity according to
your own experience, thus become informed of valid data and quarantine
all personally unevaluated data. Another words, don't let yourself get
sold so easily. Busying yourself VETting (Verify Elicited Testimony)
out what you have already purchased—intellectually prescribed to, because
just because you don't know it, doesn't mean that you are not conveying
lies when you tell others erroneous data that you have been exposed to
and passed it along without effectively evaluating it, yourself,
according to an honest view of your own personal experience in life.
-
The position of Pitcher is at the
intersection of the DRIP's four axes and
represents the Players that coordinate the interactivity of the
management between the four axes' hierarchies. Pitcher
is the Negotiation Position of the DRIP governing (cyber) system
model/mockup/paradigm.
-
The main reason for the entrance of this row is to
level out the orientation of the concept of the Hindu "Caste
System," in order to promote the concept of tantamount
individual value.
-
DEMON (Destructive Evil
Machine Obliterating Nations) is the EOW's (Evilly
Ordered World's, pronounced "Eau" as in: an expression of pain)
Pitcher and HMMM (Helpers Maliciously Manipulating Money) is playing
Shortstop.
-
ANGEL (A Nice Good Everlasting
Love) is the ROWS' (Rightly Ordered World Situation') Pitcher and
WHO (Wise Honest Organization) is their Shortstop.
|
Last Edited on & at:
2011-09-01 13:46
EUST
|
2006-2007®Philip B. Obsharsky.
All rights reserved. This material may be copied, or
transmitted as long as any source information that is included
with it, it meaning any part of the composition of this
material that is transmitted or copied for any reason, is
retained with it and this copyright statement is retained
as a part of it and no financial compensation is sought or
derived for such action.
|
|
|